Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Social anxiety disorder(Book)

:{{la|Social anxiety disorder(Book)}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Social_anxiety_disorder(Book) Stats])

:({{Find sources|Social anxiety disorder(Book)}})

The book appears to exist, according to Amazon and similar websites, but has received no reviews that could be discovered and is not referred to in any available reliable source. Fails WP:GNG Kim Dent-Brown ^(Talk) 08:41, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

• Delete From the screenshots on the selling sites, this appears to be published via Lambert Academic Publishing. No references, no evidence of meeting :WP:NBOOK. (In the world of today, a speedy category is really needed for books, in my opinion.) AllyD (talk)
• Delete , If you really want to delete it , You Can put it as a source in the main article of Social Anxiety Disorder, This book was written By Fadi Arodaki who is my brother.GhiathArodaki (talk) 17:53, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
• Delete. There are no reliable sources to show that this book is ultimately notable per WP:NBOOK. It exists, but existing is not notability. I would argue against putting it in the SAD article, as there is nothing to show that this is a particularly noteworthy book about the disorder that would merit it being added. There are already a variety of sources in the article and a selection of books in a "further reading" section, so at this point we need to be selective about what we include in the article. I don't mean this to sound insulting, but unless your brother is a particularly noteworthy person in his field (which doesn't seem to be the case here), the book shouldn't be added. We can't add every book by every author to the article and at this point we have to be very selective about what we use as sources. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:53, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
• Delete. --Faris El-Gwely (talk) 07:28, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:18, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:19, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.