Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Socialism with a Northern Accent

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010Talk 16:16, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

=[[Socialism with a Northern Accent]]=

:{{la|Socialism with a Northern Accent}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Socialism_with_a_Northern_Accent Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Socialism with a Northern Accent}})

I couldn't establish that this meets WP:NBOOK or WP:GNG Boleyn (talk) 13:45, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:24, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:24, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:24, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

  • Keep per the significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. The article contains four sources:

    1. {{cite web|last=Callaghan|first=John|url=http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/book-review-socialism-with-a-northern-accent-radical-traditions-for-modern-times/|title=Book Review: Socialism With A Northern Accent: Radical Traditions for Modern Times|publisher=London School of Economics|date=29 July 2012|accessdate=6 December 2014}}
    2. {{cite web|last=Brown|first=Matthew|url=http://www.independentlabour.org.uk/main/2012/03/28/socialism-with-a-northern-accent/|title=Socialism with a Northern Accent|publisher=Independent Labour Publications}}
    3. {{cite web|url=http://www.redpepper.org.uk/socialism-with-a-northern-accent/|title=Northern soul: Socialism with a Northern Accent|work=Red Pepper|date=September 2012|accessdate=6 December 2014}}
    4. {{cite news|url=http://www.examiner.co.uk/lifestyle/nostalgia/nostalgia-radical-read-looks-back-4954675|title=Nostalgia: Radical read looks back to the future|date=18 April 2012|accessdate=6 December 2014|publisher=Huddersfield Daily Examiner |no-tracking=yes }}
    The Independent Labour Publications article might not be reliable but the other three are.

    There is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow Socialism with a Northern Accent to pass Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline, which requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject".

    Cunard (talk) 22:58, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

:*The book passes Wikipedia:Notability (books)#Criteria, which says:

A book is notable if it verifiably meets, through reliable sources, at least one of the following criteria:

1. The book has been the subject of two or more non-trivial published works appearing in sources that are independent of the book itself. This includes published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, other books, television documentaries and reviews. ...

Cunard (talk) 22:58, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

  • Keep Given the significant coverage in the reviews found by Cunard, which establishes notability. Davewild (talk) 09:01, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
  • Nomination withdrawen my error, Boleyn (talk) 09:18, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.