Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Society for Canadian Women in Science and Technology

=[[Society for Canadian Women in Science and Technology]]=

:{{la|Society for Canadian Women in Science and Technology}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Society for Canadian Women in Science and Technology}}|2=AfD statistics}})

:({{Find sources|Society for Canadian Women in Science and Technology}})

Article has no sources. Appears to be a promotion for the organization (organization may be very worthy, but ...), many parts lifted directly from website. Creator of the article appears to be affiliated with organization (a director on the website whose name and creator's username are very similar). Bbb23 (talk) 09:27, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:51, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Delete - They've changed just enough for it to not be CSD'd as a copyvio. It isn't notable and reads as nothing but promotional material. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 22:03, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Delete most of the sources in gnews come straight from the Vancouver universities it is involved in. thus are not reliable sources. [http://news.google.com/archivesearch?as_q=&num=10&hl=en&btnG=Search+Archives&as_epq=Society+for+Canadian+Women+in+Science+and+Technology&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_user_ldate=&as_user_hdate=&lr=&as_src=&as_price=p0&as_scoring=a]. LibStar (talk) 14:26, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
  • Delete. Appears to be self promotion. Figureofnine (talk) 15:16, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.