Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Society of Petrophysicists and Well Log Analysts
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Without any substance, WP:ITSOLD is not a sufficient argument to keep an article. ✗plicit 07:26, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
=[[:Society of Petrophysicists and Well Log Analysts]]=
:{{la|1=Society of Petrophysicists and Well Log Analysts}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|title=Society of Petrophysicists and Well Log Analysts}})
I conducted a thorough WP:BEFORE search, including through Google, Google Books, Google News, Google Scholar, ProQuest, and Newspapers.com, but nowhere could I find significant coverage of the organization in independent reliable sources—only passing mentions, press releases, and the like. These sorts of organizations are not inherently notable, and there is insufficient sourcing to meet WP:NORG. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:00, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:00, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
:Sometimes you'll find stuff with Duckduckgo.
:I did find a good amount of talk regarding this organization , from reliable sources, but I wouldn't call it significant. Therefore Delete. Rlink2 (talk) 17:29, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
- Keep longstanding and well-established professional association. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 19:25, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Full of primary sources. Fails WP:ORG. LibStar (talk) 02:12, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.