Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Socip

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 00:02, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

=[[Socip]]=

:{{la|Socip}} ([{{fullurl:Socip|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Socip}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Advert for non-notable event. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 00:19, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

:Keep This is a public event that has some value. It's surely a bad quality stub, but let someone improve it. --Mblumber (talk) 00:58, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Delete seems to be a tradeshow/conference for which I am having a hard time finding notability. It undoubtedly exists, but showing notability via multiple reliable sources is going to prove very difficult. [http://www.google.com/search?um=1&ned=us&hl=en&q=SoCIP%20conference&sa=N&tab=nw] — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 17:01, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Delete Non-notable and spammy 114.158.117.221 (talk) 06:08, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
Delete, cannot find any indication that this is at all notable. No number of attendees for this "annual" conference that only started last year, no references that are independent of S2C, and the article is a blatant advertisement. Somno (talk) 06:52, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
Delete as an advertisment. Almost a CSD G11. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 12:38, 28 March 2009 (UTC).

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.