Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Softarex

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Insufficient sources found to meet WP:GNG and WP:NCORP. RL0919 (talk) 15:43, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

=[[:Softarex]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|Softarex}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Softarex Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Softarex}})

Promotional article created, No WP:RS, all sources are primary on the page, very clearly fails WP:GNG. Meeanaya (talk) 04:21, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Meeanaya (talk) 04:21, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 04:21, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

  • Delete. I was able to find one decent quality source that would help to establish notability[https://venturebeat.com/2012/10/03/what-do-software-developers-and-cabaret-dancers-have-in-common-softarex/], but only the one. Beyond that, I found various routine coverage and passing mentions, but nothing that seemed to meet the criteria for multiple instances of significant coverage required by WP:NCORP. Lowercaserho (talk) 05:40, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom and above Fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP .Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 13:00, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.