Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Someones Ugly Daughter

=[[Someones Ugly Daughter]]=

:{{la|Someones Ugly Daughter}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Someones Ugly Daughter}})

Fails WP:NALBUMS. No significant coverage in independent, reliable sources [http://www.google.com/webhp?hl=en#sclient=psy&hl=en&site=webhp&q=Chick+%22Someones+Ugly+Daughter%22+-ebay+-amazon&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.&fp=7238162b9d76d8e6] and the band is redlinked. Ks0stm (TCG) 04:13, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:18, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

  • Delete - It comes very close to qualifying speedy delete #A9 because the band article does not exist. There is a statement of importance (also required for #A9) about appearing on Beavis & Butthead, so regular old "Delete" is in order due to a shortage of notability otherwise. --DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 17:42, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
  • Delete. No evidence of notability. Noting that CSD wasn't used due to a slight possible claim of importance. This related to a specific song being included on a TV show, which is too minor to evidence notability and in any case WP:NOTINHERITED (the album doesn't become notable because a song on it was played on TV). Searched for other evidence, couldn't find any. FT2 (Talk | email) 01:10, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.