Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sonam Multani

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e deckertalk 00:30, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

=[[Sonam Multani]]=

:{{la|Sonam Multani}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Sonam_Multani Stats])

:({{Find sources|Sonam Multani}})

Well the only source was on Facebook. This also looks like a too soon case as she is a model who JUST started this year (excluding ads) Wgolf (talk) 21:57, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 22:21, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:29, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:29, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:29, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

WP:INDAFD [https://4d1fac7452666a9f1a1e7b6fa5af791fa725173b.googledrive.com/host/0B3ke7sJYbO1gVkRjUVh6bmtqeVU/IndianEnglishNewspaperSearch.html#gsc.tab=0&gsc.q=Sonam%20Multani&gsc.sort= Sonam Multani]

  • Comment - I added a link above which can be use to find some references but still it appears the case of WP:TOOSOON. CutestPenguinHangout 14:59, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 18:09, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

  • Delete A new model starting out, no evidence of the notability requirements for inclusion, general or otherwise. I can find no significant independent coverage that can be added to the article to support keeping it. --Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 15:07, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.