Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Song of a Bard and Other Poems

=[[Song_of_a_Bard_and_Other_Poems]]=

{{ns:0|F}}

AfDs for this article:
    {{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Song_of_a_Bard_and_Other_Poems}}

:{{la|Song_of_a_Bard_and_Other_Poems}} ([{{fullurl:Song_of_a_Bard_and_Other_Poems|wpReason={{urlencode:AfD discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Song of a Bard and Other Poems}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Not notable, original research, weasel words, self promotion. Unrag (talk) 04:31, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

No reliable sources, no verifibility, innappropriate tone, weasel words, and clearly either original research or copy/pasting; article created and contributed to by a single person.

--Abusing (talk) 04:58, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

  • probably delete though a review is supplied. But books are not subject to speedy deletion as non notable ,so the speedy tag as been removed.
  • Delete. Can't see any speedy criterion that this meets, but it's clearly not notable. Stifle (talk) 14:14, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete, clearly not-notable; Looks like a vanity page; Inappropriate tone for an encyclopedia. Sintihca (talk) 15:18, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:35, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete per others, obviously non-notable, spam. Unrag, you don't need to [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Song_of_a_Bard_and_Other_Poems&diff=232924000&oldid=232650229 prod the article] while the AFD is still in progress. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 20:02, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.