Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sonia Hossain

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|Sonia Hossain}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Sonia_Hossain Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Sonia Hossain}})

Has been created in order to circumvent an AfC process; Draft:Sonia Hossain has been rejected multiple times.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:24, 4 April 2019 (UTC) Ymblanter (talk) 18:24, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:27, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:27, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:27, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:27, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:28, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:29, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:43, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

• comment Would you elaborate on your deletion rationale? With rare exceptions, AfC is an optional process. The article is different from the draft that was declined for failing to demonstrate notability. Are you saying that the topic is not notable? --Worldbruce (talk) 17:45, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
• : I do not see how the topic is notable, and I do not see how the article is different from the draft.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:10, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
• : {{Disagree}}The draft has been canceled, given the reason for the comment option of the draft. This draft had no references. Notability cannot be established without references, so the draft is rejected.But this does not prove that this article is also removable. Because, there is a reference to the article to be verified.-Dot71 (talk) 07:56, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
• : {{comment}} If you think the article is not significant then you have a few hundred articles related to the Bangladeshi model in the wiki that must be removed. See the category- [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Bangladeshi_male_television_actors Bangladeshi male television actors], [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Bangladeshi_female_models Bangladeshi female models], [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Bangladeshi_television_actresses Bangladeshi television actresses]-Dot71 (talk) 08:37, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
• Comment - User:Ymblanter - As your AFD is presented, it is subject to Speedy Keep. It is quite true that the draft was declined three times and has now been declined a fourth and a fifth time. That is not a reason for nominating the article for deletion. Do you mean that the actress does not satisfy acting notability? The draft was declined because it was not properly referenced and did not establish notability. The article has better references. One can still argue notability. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:04, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
• Comment - Moving a declined draft into article space is (with exceptions involving conflict of interest) permitted, in particular as a way to request the opinion of the community as to whether the draft should be in article space. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:14, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
• Weak Delete - Neither this article nor a Google search shows independent third-party in-depth coverage by reliable sources. Google search shows that she exists and uses social media and is not the same person as Sonya Hussain. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:32, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
• Delete – Subject does not appear meet WP:NACTOR, and I cannot find any significant coverage to meet WP:GNG. The coverage I can find are passing mentions and routine television programming announcements. Leviv ich 15:12, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
• Comment - Since two editors have presented notability arguments, which are policy-based, for deletion, a Speedy Keep is no longer in order. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:58, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.