Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sophal Ear

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Non-notable assistant professor; does not meet BIO seicer | talk | contribs 14:48, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

=[[Sophal Ear]]=

:{{la|Sophal Ear}} ([{{fullurl:Sophal Ear|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sophal Ear}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

I stumbled across this and myself didn't see any claim to notability, and then saw that similar concerns had previously been raised on the talk page. He has published some work in the field, but I don't see how he meets WP:PROF. Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:04, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:51, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
Delete Assistant professors are almost automatically not notable, and this fellow doesn't seem to have any claim to fame other than activities normally associated with being an assistant professor. RJC ^Talk_Contribs 01:14, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
delete no claim to notability, per nom & RJC. Pete.Hurd (talk) 05:45, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
Delete per nom and RJC. Misses WP:PROF. --Crusio (talk) 07:08, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
Delete, per all of the above comments. A junior scholar, does not pass WP:PROF yet. Nsk92 (talk) 10:37, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
Delete per nom and comments ^^^ coccyx bloccyx_(toccyx) 17:46, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.