Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sosatie

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was

Keep per consensus and article's improvement. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sosatie&diff=cur&oldid=130899517 diff] Pea ceNT 14:21, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

=[[Sosatie]]=

:{{la|Sosatie}} – (View AfD)(View log)

WP:NOT#OR, WP:NOT#DICT, just to name a few of the policies this article fails. ~ Magnus animuM ≈ √∞ 22:47, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Keep It is just a stub, please tag it properly and wait until it gets fixed.- Flubeca t 22:51, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
Keep. Magnus Animum jumped the gun nominating this one. I did basic some cleaup. A minimal amount of research on Google could produce some infomation to expand this stub. —Gaff ^ταλκ 22:53, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
Comment: Sorry, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sosatie&oldid=130899517 when I tagged the article], it looked like OR and a definition, sorry. ~ Magnus animuM ≈ √∞ 00:11, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
Keep - [http://books.google.com/books?id=1s-a7EMM6BgC&pg=PA72&ots=rhNfsc6d65&dq=Sosatie&sig=X6JzHUXqy_c1sM34uwXDr906etA here] is a better reference. Tearlach 00:21, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
Keep - Wikipedia is not a dictionary, but this article does not read like a dictionary definition - rather a stub that needs some work. --Ali 00:48, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
Keep. Its whats for dinner. Minimal rewrite has addressed concerns flagged by nominator. RFerreira 06:04, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
Keep this is all fact and is WP:V in South Africa. IZAK 04:03, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.