Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sotiel-Migollas mine

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_preload&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Sotiel-Migollas mine}}&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sotiel-Migollas mine}}&editintro=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_intro&preloadtitle={{urlencode:Sotiel-Migollas mine}}§ion=new&title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_undeletion&create=Request request the article's undeletion]. ✗plicit 14:52, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

=[[:Sotiel-Migollas mine]]=

:{{la|1=Sotiel-Migollas mine}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Sotiel-Migollas mine}})

Possibly doesn't fall into the guidelines of WP:N, or needs more information/sources. Mazzua24 (talk) 14:44, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. Mazzua24 (talk) 14:44, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
Delete per norm. --Vaco98 (talk) 15:07, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.