Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soto makikomi

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:39, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

=[[Soto makikomi]]=

:{{la|Soto makikomi}} ([{{fullurl:Soto makikomi|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soto makikomi}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Judo move of questionable notability. I do not feel that specific moves within a martial arts discipline, unless of particular note, deserve their own page. Additionally, WP:NOTHOWTO. Tyrenon (talk) 05:22, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 12:08, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
Keep the basic throws of Judo, an Olympic sport, are highly notable. They have been written about extensively. They should be treated as are tactics/techniques from other sports. JJL (talk) 17:46, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
Keep. Wikipedia is not a paper encyclopedia and this seems like a well-documented technique used in a highly notable sport. I see encyclopedic value, sufficient notability.

:http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22Soto%20makikomi

:http://books.google.com/books?q=%22Soto+makikomi — Rankiri (talk) 03:46, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Speedy Keep Disruptive nomination per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/O goshi. Colonel Warden (talk) 23:16, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.