Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/South London Boroughs

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge tracks into, and redirect to, Burial discography. (non-admin closure) Kraxler (talk) 17:21, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

=[[South London Boroughs]]=

:{{la|South London Boroughs}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/South_London_Boroughs Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|South London Boroughs}})

The EP lacks nobility in independent, reliable sources. [http://www.electronicbeats.net/revolution9-an-interview-with-kode9/ This was the only reliable source I could find] that even barely talked about the subject. 和DITOR E tails 04:08, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 04:37, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

Keep The artist is very well known, and you were able to find a source. I believe there are more sources out there; but with releases such as this, you will have to do some digging. The Undead Never Die (talk) 11:35, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
Saying to keep the article because the artist is well know is definitely a great example of a useless inherited nobility argument. And besides, I digged as hard as I could with this. ([https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#tbm=bks&q=%22South+London+Boroughs%22+%22Burial%22 Google Books]: The first result is just saying the title of the song itself, and the other 3 results only mention the EP very briefly without going in-depth enough and that's it) ([https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=%22South+London+Boroughs%22+%22Burial%22&tbm=nws Google News]: I know Google News removed that archive search feature, and I will never forgive them for that, but the same case is here, all that's in this search are either just mentions of the name of the EP or just talking about the title song rather than the actual EP, [https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=%22South+London+Boroughs%22+%22Burial%22&start=0 Regular Google Serach]: All I could find here were very few articles talking about the EP, most of them which are non-independent, non-notable blog posts. I rest my case. 和DITOR E tails 13:43, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:10, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

When you google search for an album, you often times have to search for more than the album title plus the artist name. Here, you have a generic EP name and a generic artist name. Saying to keep the article because the artist is well known isn't an argument for inherited notability; but rather it was pointing out your flaws in not searching hard enough to find this album anywhere online. The Undead Never Die (talk) 00:56, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —☮JAaron95 ^Talk 03:52, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

Merge to Burial discography where we can easily add a 'tracks' column to the EPs section, making this article redundant. --Michig (talk) 06:44, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —☮JAaron95 ^Talk 09:12, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

{{{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.