Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spain–Tonga relations

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:41, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

=[[:Spain–Tonga relations]]=

:{{la|1=Spain–Tonga relations}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Spain–Tonga relations}})

Fails WP:GNG. Lack of significant third party coverage. This article is primarily based on the Spanish Ministry of Foreign Affairs. The article even admits relations are very little: "geographical remoteness and the scarcity of historical ties - presence of Spanish navigators at the end of the 18th century - explain the low level of bilateral relations between the two countries". The section on cooperation is about European Union-Tonga relations not Spain-Tonga relations. LibStar (talk) 23:13, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:57, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:57, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oceania-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:57, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

Delete.per nom.Best Regards.---✨Lazy Maniik✨ 02:39, 28 October 2021 (UTC) {{small|Sockpuppet of blocked user {{np|Lazy Maniik}}. ✗plicit 14:11, 1 November 2021 (UTC)}}
Delete - clear original research. The only place where this relationship exists at all is here on Wikipedia. Exists + exists ≠ "bilateral relations". St★lwart¹¹¹ 10:38, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Delete per nom. Waddles 🗩 🖉 15:58, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Delete - this is basically a Wikipedian's original topic, which it pretty much admits. No evidence of any significant coverage from sources that we would consider reliable Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 06:41, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Delete – all the other editors know what's going on. Minkai^(rawr!)_{(see where I screwed up)} 17:35, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Delete, Fails notability, not enough 3rd party reliable sources. Alex-h (talk) 12:24, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.