Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spain–Zambia relations

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Foreign relations of Spain and Foreign relations of Zambia. The keep !voters do not provide significant guideline or policy based rationales for article retention. The first keep !vote does not provide any sources to verify their claim that more sources can be found, and the second keep !vote simply states that the article needs improvement, but does not provide evidence that the topic meets notability guidelines. North America1000 07:46, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

=[[:Spain–Zambia relations]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|Spain–Zambia relations}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Spain%E2%80%93Zambia_relations Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Spain–Zambia relations}})

fails WP:GNG. there are no resident embassies, nor agreements, nor state visits. Even the article admits "relations are limited and are mainly framed in the context of relations with the EU of the Cotonou Agreement". trade is miniscule even the article says Zambia ranks as a customer in position 149 [of about 200 countries] LibStar (talk) 02:09, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:26, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:26, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:26, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

  • Keep We can certainly find more sources, and this is not an obvious WP:GNG fail. Ambrosiawater (talk) 02:35, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

:: WP:MUSTBESOURCES LibStar (talk) 03:25, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

  • Weak Keep Definitely need more content and independent sources to make it a clear WP:GNG. PenulisHantu (talk) 05:03, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yunshui  09:49, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 21:22, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.