Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spandex fetishism

:{{la|Spandex fetishism}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Spandex fetishism}})

A non notable fetish. All ghits on the first page are of the nonreliable variety. Guerillero | My Talk 22:25, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:51, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

• Delete - There are a vast number of forms of fetishism. Indeed, Fetishism is encyclopedic topic. This subject isn't notable, however, in that it is not the subject of multiple, independent, substantial published sources and worthy of encyclopedic coverage. Carrite (talk) 23:55, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
• Keep, ({{Find sources|Spandex fetishism}}) — I'm seeing a sufficient amount of secondary source coverage in order to warrant retention and further improvement of quality to the article page. Particularly in searches of books, news sources, and even among scholarly academic sources and references. — Cirt (talk) 15:07, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

• Keep per the references provided by Cirt, the topic is notable and the article can be referenced and improved. --SupernovaExplosion (talk) 13:17, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

• Keep as per references, this is a notable fetish. a_man_alone (talk) 13:38, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
• Keep - a Google book search containing the two words turns up plenty of hits and the subject matter is encyclopaedic as contributing to comprehensive coverage of fetishes. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹^Speak 17:02, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.