Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spatula City

:{{la|Spatula City}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Spatula City}})

The material in question is not encyclopedic: the bit is not well known outside fan circles, and far too much detail is present that will bore, distract or confuse a non-fan, In other words, fancruft. WCityMike 05:16, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

• merge/redirect to the movie's article. Hilarious bit from a very funny movie, but not independently notable. Beeblebrox (talk) 05:36, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:35, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
• Keep. There's support for separate notability in the article: its role on Rush Limbaugh, the fact that they loved the bit so much in Tulsa that they left the sign up for months after the film crew left town, and The New York Times choice of this song to invoke Weird Al's style in a 2004 article. --Arxiloxos (talk) 03:38, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

---

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:47, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

• Merge with the film's main article. It's not notable outside the film as a whole. --BlueSquadronRaven 07:36, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
• Merge into the main film article. Not independent enough separate from the film.--Yaksar (let's chat) 09:03, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.