Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SpeakersBank

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|SpeakersBank}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/SpeakersBank Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|SpeakersBank}})

:("Speakers Trust": {{Find sources AFD|Speakers Trust}})

Advertisement since its creation, substantial conflict of interest editing, no chance of meeting WP:NCORP. My one concern is that Speakers Bank, an atoll in the Indian Ocean, could be a possible redirect target as a misspelling, but I don't think it's plausible enough to justify a redirect. TeraTIX 13:15, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. TeraTIX 13:26, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. TeraTIX 13:26, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. TeraTIX 13:26, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. TeraTIX 13:26, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

• Delete Blatantly promotional, no evidence of meeting GNG. I wouldn't object to creating a redirect after deletion, but there's no reason to keep this advertisement in the history. This seems an implausible mispelling for the atoll, and once this entry is gone it should show up in search just fine, where it currently sits at #2. MarginalCost (talk) 13:51, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
• Delete as per nomination Mccapra (talk) 21:16, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
• Delete, no need to maintain this promo puff piece in the absence of actual notability. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 13:01, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
• Delete: A promotional article containing unsubstantiated claims and material written in the first-person. These factors could be fixed by editing, but neither under the original name or the current "Speakers Trust" name (which I appended to FindSources above) am I finding the substantial in-depth coverage needed for :WP:ORG. AllyD (talk) 07:40, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
• Delete WP:SOAPBOX —AE (talk • contributions) 13:54, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
• Delete per nom Daask (talk) 22:07, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.