Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Special education

:{{la|Special education}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Special education}})

If this section does not get improved, then there is no point of having an article that does not provide a worldwide perspective. The section is strictly from a North American perspective. If someone can improve on it, I would be happy to keep this article. For now this article is horrible with this section in it, which is why I’m proposing for deletion. That information in that section is entirely wrong. They used the sources for misinformation. Here in the US, inclusion only means that a student is in regular classes full time, not partially in regular classes. If it were partially inclusion in the US, then that would be mainstreaming. I don’t see how that statement reflects a worldwide perspective. Schildy819 (talk) 12:07, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

• Keep I believe the wrong process is being used here. AFD is only for the deletion of articles because the subject doesn't belong in the encyclopedia, and certainly not because a single section may have an issue. If it's not something that you can fix yourself I'd recomend using the articles talk page. Also on the talk page there are several wiki-projects listed as having interest in the article. It may be that if you noted a concern on one of those talk pages it would bring some qualified editors in to help.--Cube lurker (talk) 13:04, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.