Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spellblast

=[[Spellblast]]=

:{{la|Spellblast}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Spellblast Stats])

:({{Find sources|Spellblast}})

No reason to consider them notable, only reference self published & can't see anything of worth when I google them. TheLongTone (talk) 16:00, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

:::Not really other stuff exists: its a justifiction for having written this article, and a fair one. The implication is that if the band is non-notable, its recordings are also non-notable (which I believe to be the case). A new article was recently created on one of these: following the linked band name I thought that they were not notable, & so AFD the band, which clears the way to PROD or CSD the articles on the individual recordings. TheLongTone (talk) 19:55, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:54, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:54, 23 October 2012 (UTC)


:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 05:22, 29 October 2012 (UTC)


:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.