Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spewer

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Nomination withdrawn Marasmusine (talk) 11:49, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

=[[Spewer]]=

:{{la|Spewer}} ([{{fullurl:Spewer|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spewer}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Can not find any reliable sources that provide non-trivial coverage of this game to establish notability. I found a couple of sources that mention the game in passing but no significant coverage. A new name 2008 (talk) 00:50, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

:*withdraw nomination based on new information that I missed on my search for sources. A new name 2008 (talk) 22:52, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

*Delete as non-notable. Crafty (talk) 13:38, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

:*Changing to keep following the addition of references. Crafty (talk) 22:48, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

Keep [http://jayisgames.com/archives/2009/05/spewer.php review] on Jay is Games, [http://www.indiegames.com/blog/2009/05/browser_game_pick_spewer_edmun.html piece] on indiegames.com (part of the Gamasutra network), another [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/articles/view/editorials/alt-escape/6049-Alt-Escape-Spewer piece] on The Escapist, it's on [http://www.destructoid.com/indie-nation-60-spewer-130804.phtml Destructoid's regular indie column]. Someone another 14:37, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

:*Now cited. Someone another 15:42, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

::*Oh. It's also in MacLife magazine - [http://www.maclife-digital.com/maclife/200908/?pg=74 online version here], there's a short piece from Derek Yu on his website TIGSource [http://tigsource.com/articles/2009/05/06/spewer here] (fine little bit of reception info). I can has cake? Someone another 16:02, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

:::*Now cited. That's it for sources as far as I can see. Someone another 17:26, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. Someone another 15:09, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
Keep - Now that Someone another has found several references, I can't see any reason to delete this. It certainly seems notable. —LedgendGamer 22:05, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.