Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spiritual-Normal

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:47, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

=[[Spiritual-Normal]]=

:{{la|Spiritual-Normal}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Spiritual-Normal}})

Wikipedia is not a forum to put up your personal beliefs. Content is not suited for an encyclopedia. ^Avic _ennasis @ 12:09, 24 Av 5771 / 12:09, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. —^Avic _ennasis @ 13:09, 24 Av 5771 / 13:09, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

Delete as a neologistic soapbox. St Anselm (talk) 13:38, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
delete I can see an article with this title consisting of encyclopedic content describing the content of the belief and the context in which and by whom it is believed. however, this personal essay with no secondary sourcing is never going to turn into that article ever. thus delete with no prejudice. — alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 14:17, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
Delete: when you've got an article sourced only to primary religious texts, that's a pretty good indication that it is original research. Nor do I see the coverage in reliable sources that might justify any kind of rescue. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 16:46, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
Delete - Random religious musings do not belong in Wikipedia. Bella the Ball (talk) 09:27, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
Delete as the procedural nominator. I dream of horses (T) @ 03:46, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.