Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Splash conception (3rd nomination)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:59, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

=[[:Splash conception]]=

AfDs for this article:

{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Splash conception}}

:{{la|Splash conception}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Splash_conception_(3rd_nomination) Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Splash conception}})

WP:NOTDICT, also a slang term with no actual reliable sources that use it - in fact, it's primarily used by sources which cite wikipedia or urban dictionary, so WP:CIRCULAR applies as well. Praxidicae (talk) 17:07, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:12, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

Delete: Concur with nom, need reliable sources to establish notability and non-trivial discussion in those reliable source on the topic to summarize in order to have enough content for an article. Clearly fails WP:NOTDICT. Waggie (talk) 19:49, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
Delete as per nomination.TH1980 (talk) 04:16, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Delete as per unmatched opening bracket and per nomination. 84percent (talk) 12:22, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.