Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sporting Life (musician)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was nomination withdrawn. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 01:50, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

=[[:Sporting Life (musician)]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|Sporting Life (musician)}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Sporting_Life_(musician) Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Sporting Life (musician)}})

Nothing that indicates notability, huge referencing problems - contains only one footnote. Apples&Manzanas (talk) 01:12, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

:Withdrawn by nominator. For reasons mentioned below. Apples&Manzanas (talk) 01:30, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. J947(c), at 03:48, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. J947(c), at 03:48, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

  • Comment. "Contains only one footnote" doesn't convince me that you looked anywhere but in the article to determine likely notability here. A quick Google search found these on just the first two pages: [https://www.factmag.com/2015/09/30/sporting-life-interview/], [https://www.thefader.com/2015/11/24/sporting-life-ratking-55-5s-interview], [https://crackmagazine.net/article/live-reviews/wiki-sporting-life/], [https://www.dummymag.com/features/sporting-life-interview-555s/], [https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/4x87bw/spotlight-sporting-life-slam-dunk-interview-profile], [https://theface.com/music/face-mix-sporting-life-nyc-rap], [https://www.spin.com/tag/sporting-life/]. --Michig (talk) 11:52, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Comment. I may have got this one wrong, perhaps i should have considered simply redirecting this article until such time as it can be improved with regard to reliable sources.Apples&Manzanas (talk) 02:35, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Keep. Easily enough coverage exists to satisfy notability guidelines. --Michig (talk) 18:43, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.