Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spring Lake Park School District 16

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. SarahStierch (talk) 01:52, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

=[[Spring Lake Park School District 16]]=

:{{la|Spring Lake Park School District 16}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Spring_Lake_Park_School_District_16 Stats])

:({{Find sources|Spring Lake Park School District 16}})

No RS and The creator notes is: "I initiated this page for my place of employment." which seems to be a conflict of interest WP:CONFLICT. Tyros1972 Talk 10:08, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

  • Weak keep - it's about a school district, not a commercial business. The article, while very badly written, isn't written in a manner you could call advertising. As a school district servicing multiple cities it might be inherently notable, though I'm not totally sure about that. Some guy (talk) 11:00, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
  • Delete Unless expanded, no sources. Can't seem to find a reasonable redirect. First of all I don't think it's right to falsely accuse someone of being paid to create an article. It isn't promotional in anyway, it would be promotional if they said that the school is a wonderful school for your child to attend or something like that. JayJayWhat did I do? 15:48, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
  • Comment Thank you for pointing that out, I agree. I reworded it to be more accurate. Tyros1972 Talk 18:39, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:53, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:54, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

  • Comment. As Some guy notes above, school districts are considered inherently notable. We generally keep them and merge non-notable schools into them. • Gene93k (talk) 00:57, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 12:04, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

  • Keep and rename to "Spring Lake Park Schools", which is the common name for the district. It seems that Minnesota numbers its school districts, but that these numbers aren't always used. A book called [http://books.google.com/books?id=baCCHAAACAAJ&dq=%22%22Spring+Lake+Park+School+District+16:+Its+Predecessors,+Creation+and+Growth+Through+1975-76,%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=eH7HUZvvKc6ajALixoGICQ&ved=0CC0Q6AEwAA Spring Lake Park, School District 16, Its Predecessors, Creation and Growth Through 1975-76] was published about the district. There is plenty of new coverage over many years redily available in Google News Archive. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 23:04, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 18:31, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.