Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Squeez

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 10:27, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

=[[Squeez]]=

:{{la|Squeez}} ([{{fullurl:Squeez|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Squeez}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

:({{findsources|Squeez}})

I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 02:30, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- –Juliancolton | ^Talk 14:02, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
Delete Absolutely no reliable source coverage. --Cybercobra (talk) 22:43, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:39, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 02:25, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

Delete: Per WP:RS. South Bay (talk) 02:35, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
Delete per above; I can't find significant coverage in reliable third-party sources. Them From Space 03:47, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.