Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sribhashyam Vijayasarathi

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was deleted by {{u|Sphilbrick}}.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 00:00, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

=[[Sribhashyam Vijayasarathi]]=

:{{la|Sribhashyam Vijayasarathi}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Sribhashyam_Vijayasarathi Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Sribhashyam Vijayasarathi}})

This article has no external links ie. Citations. This article also seems like biography of ordinary person. NepaliKeto62Talk to me 01:33, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:36, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:36, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

  • Delete. No appearance of any RS. Xxanthippe (talk) 01:42, 1 July 2016 (UTC).
  • He is on of the all time greats in Telangana with respect to literature. His name also mentioned in the culture of telangana article which I have added now as a reference. We will further improve the article. Please dont remove it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lpskumar (talk • contribs) 05:49, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Delete. No appearance of any RS. Uncletomwood (talk) 15:39, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

::{{ping|Uncletomwood}} just double-checking, you've had a look at the Telugu-language Prahelikalu cited in the article and have convinced yourself it isn't a reliable source? Uanfala (talk) 21:38, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

  • Delete. The awards buried in the hagiography we have here could be indicators of notability, but searching for them finds only low-quality web sites and mirrors. Otherwise this is unsourced, and would need a complete rewrite to become encyclopedic. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:23, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete Page appears to be COPYVIO of http://sribhashyamvijayasarathi.blogspot.com/ dated Tuesday, 20 September 2011. Quick search for sources is otherwise unsuccessful. The article content seems to come verbatim from that blog source. I tagged as {{db-copyvio}} and redacted the content. I am not sure how that CSD will affect AfD procedure (so I apologize if this is not the correct AfD course of action where blanking is usually not good form). FeatherPluma (talk) 21:46, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

:The above deletion debate is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.