Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Srinivas raghav

=[[Srinivas raghav]]=

:{{la|Srinivas raghav}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Srinivas raghav}}|2=AfD statistics}})

:({{findsources|Srinivas raghav}})

This smells very fishy. There are no corroborating details given for this supposed physicist's work. The originating editor is User:Theonlyoneraghav, who has only contributed to this page and Raghav. Clarityfiend (talk) 02:45, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. --  -- Lear's Fool (talk | contribs) 02:47, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. --  -- Lear's Fool (talk | contribs) 02:48, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
  • Delete. A notable physicist born in 1994 (16 years old) would be very notable indeed, but I can find nothing to back this up. There is a Srinivas Raghav Kashyap, who wrote this paper: [http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.86.9664&rep=rep1&type=pdf] (corresponding patent application here: [http://www.google.com/patents?hl=en&lr=&vid=USPATAPP12010942&id=8_S-AAAAEBAJ&oi=fnd&dq=%22Srinivas+raghav%22&printsec=abstract#v=onepage&q&f=false]), but this does not appear to be the same person, and Kashyap doesn't seem to be involved in the sphere of magnetic levitation. There is this: [http://in.linkedin.com/pub/v-srinivas-raghav/6/5A9/630] at LinkedIn, but it certainly doesn't establish notability. -- Lear's Fool (talk | contribs) 03:09, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
  • Delete - non-notable, fails WP:RS ... Shyamal (talk) 04:30, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
  • Delete. Per nomination. MiRroar (talk) 20:52, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
  • delete - looks like a duck, quacks like a duck... - UtherSRG (talk) 08:01, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
  • Delete - unreferenced BLP, apparently an autobiography by a teenager. -- Radagast3 (talk) 03:54, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.