Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stacey Clark

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 00:49, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

=[[Stacey Clark]]=

:{{la|Stacey Clark}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stacey Clark}}|2=AfD statistics}})

:({{Find sources|Stacey Clark}})

This article is unreferenced and refers to an apparently living person and therefore should be deleted whether "negative, positive, or neutral" Jay-Sebastos (talk) 04:11, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

Delete subject is a radio personality, but of no apparent notability (by our standards), despite the huge salary quoted here. she does have 5 followers on twitter. im sure shes sweet, but shes got to go for now.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 04:59, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:48, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:48, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
Delete - Unsourced BLP. Carrite (talk) 19:13, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
Delete - Unsourced, non-notable, article is trivial fluff. AndrewWTaylor (talk) 19:46, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
Delete - clearly non-notable, could have been speedied. --Orange Mike | Talk 19:02, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.