Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stacie (Barbie)

=[[Stacie (Barbie)]]=

:{{la|Stacie (Barbie)}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Stacie_(Barbie) Stats])

:({{Find sources|Stacie (Barbie)}})

Do we really need an article for every Barbie doll? I think not. CyanGardevoir (used EDIT!) 01:56, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

  • Speedy Keep No adequate reason to delete has been provided. Note that Barbie dolls are documented in sources such as Warman's Barbie Doll Field Guide and Collector's Encyclopedia of Barbie Doll Exclusives. Warden (talk) 06:59, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 16:27, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

  • Merge - come to think of it, merging is a way better idea now. Maybe I should've just WP:BEBOLD and merged it instead of RfA'ing this here... CyanGardevoir (used EDIT!) 07:17, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.