Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stacie (Barbie)
=[[Stacie (Barbie)]]=
:{{la|Stacie (Barbie)}} – (
:({{Find sources|Stacie (Barbie)}})
Do we really need an article for every Barbie doll? I think not. CyanGardevoir (used EDIT!) 01:56, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep No adequate reason to delete has been provided. Note that Barbie dolls are documented in sources such as Warman's Barbie Doll Field Guide and Collector's Encyclopedia of Barbie Doll Exclusives. Warden (talk) 06:59, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
- Merge to List of Barbie's friends and family which contains most of the same information. It would perhaps make sense to turn the latter into more of a table format. Mangoe (talk) 12:15, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 16:27, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
- Merge - come to think of it, merging is a way better idea now. Maybe I should've just WP:BEBOLD and merged it instead of RfA'ing this here... CyanGardevoir (used EDIT!) 07:17, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
- Merge with Tutti and Todd (Barbie) - My rationale is explained in more detail at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tutti and Todd (Barbie). --- Crakkerjakk (talk) 04:53, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
- Merge as per Crakkerjakk/comment - Wasn't there a 1960s Friend of Barbie also called Stacie or Stacey? (Just checked and I see her on List of Barbie's friends and family now. So if merged, the Tutti and Todd article should clarify that Stacey and Stacie aren't the same doll. Mabalu (talk) 10:28, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.