Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stan (play)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Neil Brand. , as the information has already been merged by Szzuk. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 03:52, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

=[[:Stan (play)]]=

:{{la|Stan (play)}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Stan_(play) Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Stan (play)}})

Notability concerns, there have been thousands if not tens of thousands of media portrayals of Stan Laurel and Oliver Hardy, it isn't clear why this play is notable among them. Szzuk (talk) 08:06, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 10:43, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 10:43, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:24, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton | ^Talk 02:55, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Comment Since author Neil Brand is notable, a merge to his article seems more sensible than deletion. I found some brief references, including praise for the radio adaptation. Colapeninsula (talk) 15:37, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

::I've checked the references included again, in my opinion they are trivial apart from one by the BBC which is primary, so I think this is still a delete. However you have a good point and I will merge this info into Neil Brand. Szzuk (talk) 17:50, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Redirect to Neil Brand since Szzuk has already merged the information. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 23:38, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
Oppose: I don't see why this play isn't notable enough. It's a play by a well known script writer who has his own Wikipedia article. The play itself has won several awards and has been adapted by the BBC into a radio and TV drama series (which is even easy to track down and watch on YouTube). Both the radio and TV adaptation feature professional actors. Apart from the official site of the BBC I've also added a professional review and source info from an official biography by Danny Lawrence written about Stan Laurel. This makes it far better known and established in media than just a tiny local amateur play. User:Kjell Knudde 6:52, 1 May 2017 (UTC).

::Comment. Procedural note, user is author of the article. Szzuk (talk) 17:38, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.