Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Startup Britain (2nd nomination)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. asilvering (talk) 03:12, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

=[[:Startup Britain]]=

AfDs for this article:

{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Startup Britain}}

:{{la|1=Startup Britain}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Startup Britain}})

Fails WP:ORGCRIT. Created as promo. AfD a decade ago closed as no consensus and there's been no improvement since. A campaign which appears to have had little lasting impact after initial routine news coverage. Website is now dead. Huge sections of unverifiable text. AusLondonder (talk) 07:14, 5 October 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business, Companies, and United Kingdom. AusLondonder (talk) 07:14, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:18, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Delete or {{em|maybe}} redirect to a section on one of the people related to it, for example, Luke Johnson (businessman) § Other activities. There's really nothing suitable to merge here. If someone suggests an alternate target, I don't really have a strong opinion, just pick one or delete it and make the article go away. Make targeting RfD's problem. Alpha3031 (t • c) 04:24, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
:Luke Johnson isn't even currently mentioned at the article, not sure a redirect is really necessary here. AusLondonder (talk) 05:30, 12 October 2024 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Relisting comment: Relisting. Already at AFD so not eligible for a Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:18, 12 October 2024 (UTC)

Delete: Per nom. Clearly promotional and a bare mention in one article doesn't amount to SIGCOV. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 02:53, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.