Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Startup Grind

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:24, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

=[[:Startup Grind]]=

:{{la|Startup Grind}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Startup_Grind Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Startup Grind}})

Some mentions and notices, mostly based on PR, but no substantial independent sources. The Forbes article is by a "subscriber" and is marked "Opinions expressed by Forbes Contributors are their own." -- it reads like a press release--and its author admits an affiliation in the last paragraph--he's director of one of its chapters. DGG ( talk ) 20:24, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Delete The same old WP:PROMO story: the independent sources aren't significant and the significant sources aren't independent. I can find no evidence this passes WP:CORPDEPTH, Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 14:08, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Delete Per noma nd Eggishorn. Promo, fails GNG, lack of in-depth sourcing. L3X1 (distænt write) 03:05, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.