Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stealth conservative

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Eddie891 Talk Work 15:25, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

=[[:Stealth conservative]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Stealth conservative}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Stealth conservative}})

Tagged for notability since 2010. Glorified dictionary definition. Fails the general notability policy. - UtherSRG (talk) 15:16, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

:Delete - There's nothing really to this concept that isn't already completely conveyed by the plain meaning of the two words in the phrase. It's like having an article for "conservatives over 50" or something. And more to the point, regarding GNG there's no sourcing here that demonstrates it's a unique concept, a regularly referenced strain of conservatism, well-defined jargon, or the name of a movement or well defined group of people. WilsonP NYC (talk) 16:25, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.