Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steeplechase blackpool
=[[Steeplechase blackpool]]=
:{{la|Steeplechase blackpool}} ([{{fullurl:Steeplechase blackpool|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steeplechase blackpool}}&action=delete}} delete]) –
The article claims some notability, however that is so specific that I doubt this passes the notability bar as an amusement park joy ride. But I'd be happy to be proven wrong. Passportguy (talk) 00:21, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
- Merge and rd to Pleasure_Beach,_Blackpool#Roller_Coasters. JJL (talk) 00:25, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
:*Comment in fact I see that there are a lot of articles from Pleasure_Beach,_Blackpool#Roller_Coasters that might be redirected to that page instead. JJL (talk) 00:28, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
::*Comment Although merging all of the rollercoaster articles in the above mentioned section would be a viable option, I think because of the very large fanbase for these mentioned coasters and coasters in general worldwide, that each coaster should individually have an article dedicated to them. Also as this is the last of it's kind in existence and has 1,000's upon 1,000s of riders per year I personally think that makes it a noteworthy cause for Keep. I'd like to see other people's opinions if anyone else would like to comment ? I made this article as it was the only coaster in the list that did not have a dedicated page. Norms360 (talk) 22:11, 03 June 2009 (UTC)
:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 13:26, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.