Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephan Luckhaus

:{{la|Stephan Luckhaus}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Stephan Luckhaus}})

Appears to fail WP:Academic. While he may be notable in the future, I am unable to locate any reliable sources to establish notability at the level suggested by WP:Academic. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 20:10, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:25, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:26, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

• Would the nominator please tell us what he gets for cites on Google Scholar ? Xxanthippe (talk) 01:18, 7 May 2011 (UTC).
• Keep. Passes WP:PROF#C1 by virtue of the high citation counts to his works on Google scholar, and #C3 by virtue of his membership in Leopoldina. —David Eppstein (talk) 04:39, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
• Keep. Precisely as above. Xxanthippe (talk) 04:56, 7 May 2011 (UTC).
• Keep per David Eppstein. Ray^Talk 17:36, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
• Comment - Nomination withdrawn. I had checked using Web of Science and had inadvertently used the social science index instead of the science index. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 02:15, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.