Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen Coleman

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. –Juliancolton | Talk 00:31, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

=[[Stephen Coleman]]=

:{{la|Stephen Coleman}} ([{{fullurl:Stephen Coleman|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen Coleman}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Likely a self-written autobiography of a possibly notable orchestrator. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 21:02, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

  • Extremely weak keep - Some [http://news.google.com/archivesearch?um=1&ned=us&hl=en&q=%22stephen+coleman%22+composer&cf=all evidence] of notability, but more in the way of referencing is needed. Little has changed since I nominated it for speedy deletion earlier today. -- Scjessey (talk) 01:25, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Comment: The version of the article which was nominated for deletion is a copyright violation lifted from [http://www.stephencoleman.com/bio.htm]. However, a self-identified work colleague of the subject has now replaced the copyvio with a new version, three sentences long. Sarah 03:06, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Keep Based on his [http://www.stephencoleman.com/bio.htm bio]. And the fact that AFD per policy is never supposed to be clean-up. --Firefly322 (talk) 04:02, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

::I didn't nominate this to clean it up, I nominated it based on the fact that it's likely a self-written autobiography of a possibly notable orchestrator. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 18:02, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 20:30, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Keep [http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22Stephen+Coleman%22+orchestration+source%3A%22-newswire%22+source%3A%22-wire%22+source%3A%22-presswire%22+source%3A%22-PR%22+source%3A%22-press%22+source%3A%22-release%22+source%3A%22-wikipedia%22&btnG=Search+Archives&scoring=a Evidently notable]. Colonel Warden (talk) 00:11, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.