Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen L. Price

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_preload&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Stephen L. Price}}&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen L. Price}}&editintro=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_intro&preloadtitle={{urlencode:Stephen L. Price}}§ion=new&title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_undeletion&create=Request request the article's undeletion]. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 15:30, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

=[[:Stephen L. Price]]=

:{{la|Stephen L. Price}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Stephen L. Price}})

Doesn't pass WP:GNG. I couldn't find any reliable sources via Google to establish notability. Most sources simply mention that he was mentioned "In memoriam" in the credits for a couple of films. Bmf 051 (talk) 07:15, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 June 7. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:31, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:54, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:54, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Donaldd23 (talk) 16:28, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Delete: Per WP:GNG and WP:NOTMEMORIAL. Unless somebody can find us coverage in some 1990s visual effects trade magazines, I doubt potential notability. — BriefEdits (talk) 03:27, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.