Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen Molyneux

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn DGG (talk) 02:14, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

=[[Stephen Molyneux]]=

:{{la|Stephen Molyneux}} ([{{fullurl:Stephen Molyneux|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen Molyneux}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

I am not 100% about the notability. I am not voting delete, but think discussion is needed. The article has had so many COI edits it is difficult to see if notability asserted is accurate or not. Computerjoe 's talk 16:23, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Keep and cut back. Subject is notable, but article reads like an autobiography, too rosy, COI suspicion, etc. These concerns are not valid reasons for deletion though, so I consider this AfD nom kind of misplaced. Article should be cut back leaving it to an uninvolved editor to improve; if continued COI editing takes place, editor can be warned and eventually blocked. I see no need to strain the already overloaded AfD circuit with this. Suggest speedy keep. Power.corrupts (talk) 16:53, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Keep He's notable but I agree that there are problems with the primary one being that there are no citations. BLPs must be verifiable. The proper forum is likely the COI noticeboard if there is COI since even the nominator is not asking for deletion. Drawn Some (talk) 17:11, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 17:58, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
Comment. Would not pass WP:Prof on basis of GS. Xxanthippe (talk) 07:05, 10 June 2009 (UTC).
Keep. Does not seem to pass notability requirements under WP:PROF, but based on [http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22Steve+Molyneux%22+learning this Google News search], I think he passes WP:BIO. I agree with Power.corrupts, and reduced the page to a stub.--Eric Yurken (talk) 02:04, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Nomination withdrawn I withdraw my nomination but think some more news sources should be added Computerjoe 's talk 17:25, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.