Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen Turner (academic)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:53, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

=[[Stephen Turner (academic)]]=

:{{la|Stephen Turner (academic)}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Stephen_Turner_(academic) Stats])

:({{Find sources|Stephen Turner (academic)}})

Not notable. [http://scholar.google.com.au/scholar?q=Stephen+Turner+auckland&hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5]. (not Stephen Turner of University of South Florida). Lacks coverage about him in multiple independent reliable sources. One of a glut of of articles on seemingly non notable St Peter's College old boys. Wikipedia is not a webhost for a collection bios of a schools former students. duffbeerforme (talk) 08:37, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 11:31, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 11:31, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 11:31, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

  • Weak delete. Searching in GS for "Stephen Turner" auckland I get an h-index of 7. Not quite enough for WP:Prof#C1: not much else. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:35, 12 November 2013 (UTC).
  • Delete Hasn't had any books published, lack of 3rd-party coverage, fails to meet WP:PROF. Run of the mill academic with fewer achievements than many. --Colapeninsula (talk) 14:07, 13 November 2013 (UTC)


:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 18:30, 22 November 2013 (UTC)


:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.