Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sterling Tower

:{{la|Sterling Tower}} ([{{fullurl:Sterling Tower|wpReason={{urlencode:AfD discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sterling Tower}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Delete nothing to indicate that this skyscraper is notable, no sources Carlossuarez46 (talk) 22:32, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

• Keep, it spent a year as the tallest building in Toronto and the entire British Empire[http://www.emporis.com/en/wm/bu/?id=sterlingtower-toronto-canada]. --Dhartung | Talk 23:02, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

:*Also, it is a City of Toronto Heritage Property.[http://app.toronto.ca/heritage/search.do?district=&type=COMM&ward=28] --Dhartung | Talk 23:04, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

• keep if Dhartung adds the information to the article.DGG (talk) 23:30, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

:*Done. Stunning that it could have held such an honor, yet today there are 150 buildings taller than it in Toronto. --Dhartung | Talk 23:56, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

• Keep per Dhartung's expansion; almost anything that was once tallest is probably notable. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 00:06, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
• Keep per above. Having been the tallest building in one of the largest empire's in history indicates notability. --Oakshade (talk) 16:15, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
• Keep because it's a City of Toronto Heritage Property. As far as being the tallest in Toronto for a year goes, the Foshay Tower was the tallest building in Minneapolis for many years, but it's dwarfed by several taller buildings now. The Foshay Tower is still notable, though. --Elkman ^(Elkspeak) 19:23, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.