Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Andreas

:{{la|Steve Andreas}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Steve_Andreas Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Steve Andreas}})

No indication of notability. All 5 references in article are self-published books (3 of which were written Andreas himself). Seems like some sort of promo article for him. Article does not seem to meet WP:GNG or WP:BIO. FuriouslySerene (talk) 16:05, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 20:35, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 20:35, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 20:35, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 20:35, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

• Delete as none of this suggests satisfying the applicable notability and my searches have found nothing better so far. Notifying {{U|DGG}} for analysis. SwisterTwister talk 20:37, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
• Keep. Although topic is fringe, there are high GS cites for his work. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:31, 22 March 2016 (UTC).

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:30, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:30, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.