Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Segal

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JForget 00:06, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

=[[Steve Segal]]=

:{{la|Steve Segal}} – (View AfD)(View log)

:({{findsources|Steve Segal}})

Nothing in the article to suggest that this musician meets the requirements of WP:MUSIC. So far all it asserts is that this guy has worked with a string of notable musicians. This in itself is not evidence of notability. All the article's references do is show that the "has worked with" list is correct, although many of the refs are not from what would usually be reliable sources. My prod was removed by an IP who made no attempt to demonstrate the required notability. I don't really care whether the article is deleted or not, but with any luck this AfD will force someone to either prove the notability or at least make an attempt to improve this trainwreck of a musician stub. WebHamster 10:31, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Beloved Freak 10:42, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
Delete As far as I can tell, the subject does not meet any of the criteria laid out at WP:MUSICBIO. As WebHamster notes, working with a string of notable musicians isn't one of those criteria. I would be willing to change my vote to "keep" if notability under WP:MUSICBIO is demonstrated. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 17:05, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
Delete No non-trivial sources. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 17:19, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
Delete: I can't find significant coverage for him. Joe Chill (talk) 19:13, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.