Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steven Greenberg (attorney)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 13:41, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

=[[Steven Greenberg (attorney)]]=

:{{la|Steven Greenberg (attorney)}} ([{{fullurl:Steven Greenberg (attorney)|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steven Greenberg (attorney)}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Delete A Google search brought up nothing to confirm his notability and the claims of TV work in the article are not referenced. Boleyn2 (talk) 09:57, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

:Keep I found [http://www.superlawyers.com/illinois/lawyer/Steven-A-Greenberg/08104cf4-a752-489f-86f4-f9d9da97ee42.html this].--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 02:58, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

Weak keep There are sources that confirm the legal analyst claim [http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=active&rlz=1T4GFRD_en___US264&q=%22steven+greenberg%22+%22legal+analyst%22&btnG=Search], and if the author had just mentioned those, I don't know that this would have been nominated. Part of good writing is to tell people where you got your information. Mandsford (talk) 22:59, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:00, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

:*This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 15:56, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 03:39, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Delete - Pull the coats off and what's left is unverifiable and unable to sustain notability. /Blaxthos ( t / c ) 03:42, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Wikipedia is not a directory of everyone who has ever been a talking head. I don't see notability here. THF (talk) 01:37, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 23:51, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Notwithstanding a paragraph in an industry magazine Super Lawyers, I don't see any notability here. The sole claim to notability is one case, the Jeanine Nicarico murder case. Sounds pretty WP:ONEVENT to me. TJRC (talk) 00:22, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.