Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steven Hirschfeld

=[[Steven Hirschfeld]]=

:{{la|Steven Hirschfeld}} ([{{fullurl:Steven Hirschfeld|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steven Hirschfeld}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Low level minor leaguer. Giants27 (t|c|r|s) 18:05, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

:*This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:58, 8 June 2009 (UTC)


:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, I'mperator 15:03, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

  • Delete. He fails WP:ATHLETE. Popularity in the local market isn't the standard. Niteshift36 (talk) 14:03, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete, Has not been in a fully proffessional league and doesn't have significant independent coverage. A new name 2008 (talk) 14:28, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete. He's not playing for the Twins, so it makes no sense to merge there. Merge to Twin's article. He fails WP:ATHLETE and we don't hold articles in user space because we expect the subject to eventually become notable. If he does become notable at some point, the article history can then be retrieved or restored. لennavecia 16:13, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
  • He is playing in the minors for the Twins, so it makes sense to merge to Minnesota Twins minor league players where the main prospects are supposed to have mini bios. Spanneraol (talk) 16:55, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Ah, I misread. Adjusted. لennavecia 15:20, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Merge the Minnesota Twins minor league players article seems a logical target. ChildofMidnight (talk) 17:13, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Keep - not just a minor leaguer, but a minor league all-star. Rlendog (talk) 20:50, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
  • That rationale fails to refute the earlier point that no in depth coverage in multiple independent reliable sources exists, and so won't outweigh it. Cite some sources. Sources! Sources! Sources! Uncle G (talk)
  • Delete. News coverage consists of trivial mentions in articles about the draft or individual games. Lacks significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. BRMo (talk) 14:52, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.