Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stinson Leonard Street

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui ^雲 _水 09:57, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

=[[:Stinson Leonard Street]]=

:{{la|Stinson Leonard Street}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Stinson_Leonard_Street Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Stinson Leonard Street}})

Non-notable company, fails WP:NCORP and WP:GNG Joseph2302 (talk) 17:00, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:01, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:01, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:02, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

Comment. I would suggest proceeding slowly here. Sources for law firms are hard to find since there are so many false hits in sources that don't show notability; law firms are routinely named in court filings, lawyer-written articles, and directories. Good sources get lost in the haystack. But this article is about a firm formed from two firms each going back over a century, which almost certainly makes for notability. There's almost certainly some stuff out there, it'd just going to be way difficult to find, particularly online. TJRC (talk) 19:44, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
Delete - no inherent notability WP:ORGSIG - no significant achievements or innovations or impact - references are thin (Twitter, seriously?) - the "there must be sources" defence doesn't hold WP:SOURCESMAYEXIST - Epinoia (talk) 20:38, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:54, 8 May 2019 (UTC)

Delete Doesn't meet NCORP and the article reads like a directory listing. A simple search literally only shows listings with no notable external 3rd party coverage. --qedk (t 桜 c) 17:33, 8 May 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.