Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stockland Traralgon (2nd nomination)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 12:28, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

=[[:Stockland Traralgon]]=

AfDs for this article:

{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stockland Traralgon}}

:{{la|Stockland Traralgon}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Stockland_Traralgon_(2nd_nomination) Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Stockland Traralgon}})

Unremarkable shopping centre in a city with a population of only 25,000. IgnorantArmies (talk) 03:47, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

Delete Non-notable shopping mall. Fails WP:GNG. Ajf773 (talk) 05:46, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Ajf773 (talk) 21:19, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions. Ajf773 (talk) 21:19, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

Keep. Unanimously kept last time around with listed sources that never made it into the article. Needs cleanup instead. The Drover's Wife (talk) 02:09, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
delete even the last AfD called it incidential mentions. The coverage is primarily routine. At 50 odd shops it's very small by WP standards. LibStar (talk) 13:15, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
Keep per The Drover's Wife. --do ncr am 01:02, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

:: not a genuine !vote as per WP:PERX. LibStar (talk) 04:09, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Delete The old AfD was almost five years ago, and consensus can change. I'm of the view that trivial/routine coverage in local sources about a shopping mall does not satisfy WP:GNG. As a shopping mall, local news will cover it. The question is if the coverage is in depth and discusses it over a sustained amount of time as a topic in itself. I did not see that demonstrated at the last AfD and have not seen an argument for it here. TonyBallioni (talk) 04:06, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.