Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stone Key Partners

:{{la|Stone Key Partners}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Stone_Key_Partners Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Stone Key Partners}})

Promotional article for non notable firm--most sources are press releases DGG ( talk ) 01:18, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:58, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:58, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:59, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

• Keep - only 1/5 sources is actually a press release (Reuters doesn't publish press releases). The real problem with 3/5 and most of the sources I found is they are either just "company X hired Stone Key" or "person from Stone Key says Y". However, I did find two substantial sources (one of which is already in the article): [http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/02/14/stonekey-dealmakers-idUSN1429300020110214 Reuters] and [http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2009/03/24/2-bear-stearns-veterans-officially-set-up-stone-key/ NY Times]. Those 2 should be sufficient to establish notability, and the many press quotes referring to Stone Key as experts helps a bit too. Any promotional undertones can be corrected via normal editing. --ThaddeusB (talk) 21:54, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.